home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
121090
/
1210107.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
2KB
|
59 lines
<text id=90TT3298>
<title>
Dec. 10, 1990: A Case Of Biting Irony
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Dec. 10, 1990 What War Would Be Like
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 46
A Case of Biting Irony
</hdr>
<body>
<p>Accused of nipping a cop's ear, twins claim mistaken identity
</p>
<p> Who chomped off the lower part of officer David Storton's
right ear? Was it Shawn Blick or Jonathan Blick? One flicker
of doubt and both Blick brothers--who happen to be identical
twins--could get off.
</p>
<p> The fact that the two are physically identical is about the
only thing the prosecution and the defense can agree on in the
case, which is expected to go to trial this month. The Santa
Clara County district attorney's office charges that on the
night of May 10, 1988, the twins assaulted Storton when he
identified himself as a police officer, interrupting their
attempted break-in of a San Jose apartment. Attorneys for the
Blicks maintain that the twins were innocently throwing pebbles
at a friend's window to wake him when they were startled by
the officer, who was moonlighting as a security guard and was
wearing only a T-shirt and jeans; they jumped him after he drew
a gun.
</p>
<p> Identifying the actual culprit may not be necessary since
in California those who help someone commit a crime may be
found as guilty as the actual perpetrator. Still, a jury could
choose to convict only the gnasher on one of the meatier
charges facing the pair, or a judge could decide to impose a
more severe punishment. One of the four counts against each of
the 21-year-old brothers, aggravated mayhem, carries a
mandatory life sentence.
</p>
<p> Storton swears he knows who nipped him: Jonathan, the one
who had long hair on the night of the crime. Clearly an open
and shut case but for a small detail. By the time the twins
were arrested three days after the incident, both had short
haircuts. Storton still insists it was Jonathan. But one of the
defense attorneys, Chris Carroll, predicts that "there will be
substantial evidence submitted at the trial to show that the
officer was mistaken about the identity of the biter."
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>